Showing posts with label Anti-imperialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anti-imperialism. Show all posts

Friday, July 3, 2026

HUMAN JUSTICE ECONOMICS: Dead Money, Human Justice, and the Fight for Economic Dignity in 2026!-Part 1

WHY JAMAICA MUST PUT ITS WEALTH TO WORK! 


By Norris R. McDonald, DIJ, Author

Caribbean Political Analysis,

SULFABITTAS NEWS, July 3, 2026 (Updated July 13, 2026).

Norris R. McDonald, DIJ, Author, Human Rights Advocate.

At first light in rural St. Mary, Jamaica, a mother prepares breakfast over a coal stove because cooking gas has slipped beyond her reach.


What began as a temporary adjustment has hardened into a permanent condition shaped by rising prices, stagnant wages, and quiet resignation. 

Her grocery bill no longer reflects what her family needs to live with dignity, but only what they can afford to survive. Every meal represents another compromise.

This is the lived economy of the Caribbean in 2026, and it bears little resemblance to the optimistic economic statistics celebrated by governments and international financial institutions.


Official reports speak confidently of economic recovery, pointing to modest tourism growth across much of the region and spectacular GDP expansion in oil-rich Guyana. Yet beneath these encouraging numbers lies a harsher reality of declining purchasing power, widening inequality, insecure employment, unaffordable housing, and rising food insecurity. For ordinary Caribbean citizens, growth exists largely on paper.


This is the Caribbean's growth illusion.


When Growth Does Not Reach the People

Economic growth has become increasingly disconnected from human well-being. Hotels are filled, cruise ships arrive daily, and foreign investors continue to extract profits, yet many Caribbean families struggle to buy groceries, pay utility bills, or keep their children in school.


This disconnect represents far more than an economic anomaly. It is a profound failure of development policy.


From the standpoint of human justice, the illusion of prosperity amounts to a form of structural economic violence. Wealth continues to circulate outward through imported goods, foreign ownership, debt servicing, and profit repatriation rather than accumulating within Caribbean societies.


The late Jamaican economist George Beckford described this decades ago in his analysis of the plantation economy. Colonial production systems were designed to enrich external powers while leaving local populations economically dependent. Although political independence has been achieved, much of that economic architecture remains intact.


The plantation has changed its appearance, but not necessarily its purpose.


The Land Question and the Cycle of Hunger

Nowhere is this contradiction more visible than in agriculture.


Across Jamaica and much of the Caribbean, countless rural families continue farming without secure land titles. Generations have cultivated the same plots while remaining excluded from formal credit, agricultural financing, and modern investment because they cannot prove ownership.


This is not simply administrative inefficiency. It is a development failure.


The Caribbean imports billions of dollars in food annually despite possessing fertile agricultural land and a long farming tradition. Governments frequently borrow foreign currency to finance imported food that could, with proper investment, be produced domestically.


The result is a vicious cycle—a dependence that resembles a permanent debt trap.

Food insecurity therefore becomes less a consequence of limited resources than of misplaced policy priorities.


Investing in Farmers Instead of Dependence

Breaking this cycle requires more than speeches about food security.


It requires secure land tenure, expanded agricultural extension services, affordable financing, irrigation infrastructure, climate-resilient farming, storage facilities, agro-processing industries, and properly maintained feeder roads linking rural communities to markets.


Economic transformation

cannot simply be legislated.

It must be cultivated.


Every irrigated field, every rehabilitated farm road, every farmer receiving affordable credit becomes another step toward genuine national sovereignty.


Without these investments, food security remains a slogan rather than a strategy.


Dead Money and Jamaica's Idle Wealth

Perhaps the greatest contradiction within Jamaica's economic model is not its debt but its idle wealth.


Dead money is national foreign exchange earnings lies idle in foreign banks at low interest rate and is not being used  to invest in local industries, agriculture to develop national economies and human resources. 


Jamaica currently holds approximately US$6.9 billion in foreign exchange reserves—an amount approaching nearly one-third of annual GDP.


Strong reserves certainly provide protection against external shocks and currency instability. Every responsible central bank requires adequate reserves.


The larger question, however, is whether excessive reserves become "dead money" when they remain parked in low-yield foreign financial instruments while productive sectors at home remain chronically undercapitalized.


Ironically, much of this capital ultimately supports the financial system of the United States, whose national debt now exceeds US$39 trillion, while Jamaica continues borrowing to finance infrastructure, agricultural development, and industrial expansion.



At the very least, policymakers should examine whether a carefully managed portion of these reserves could capitalize a national sovereign wealth or development investment fund dedicated to strategic sectors such as:

  • climate-resilient agriculture;
  • renewable energy;
  • advanced manufacturing;
  • digital technology;
  • water infrastructure;
  • food processing; and
  • export-oriented industries.

The long-term economic multiplier from productive investment may far exceed the modest returns earned from passive foreign holdings.

Idle capital rarely builds prosperous nations.


Infrastructure Is Human Dignity

Economic development also requires something even more fundamental than investment.

It requires dignity.


More than sixty years after independence, many rural communities still struggle with unreliable water supplies, inadequate roads, poor sanitation, and inconsistent public services.

Such conditions are not merely development gaps.


They expose the unfinished project of Caribbean nation-building.


A truly sovereign society cannot celebrate macroeconomic stability while sections of its population continue living without dependable access to clean water.


Community wells, micro-dams, irrigation networks, rainwater harvesting systems, and resilient infrastructure should become national priorities rather than political afterthoughts.


My Father's Lesson in Ownership

Economic statistics rarely capture 

what transforms families.


More than sixty years ago

my father Mass Lambert built

a modest two-room board house

on Brotherton Avenue 

in Southwest St. Andrew.


We were poor.


We often survived 

on simple meals of

steam crackers and callaloo.


But we possessed something

infinitely more valuable

than many modern

 poverty programmes provide ---


We owned our home!


That modest house became 

the foundation upon which

opportunity was built!


Ownership created stability.

Stability encouraged education.

Education produced

three generations

of university graduates.


Development begins

long before GDP figures

are published.

It begins

with security

ownership, and hope!


Caribbean Resilience Cannot Replace Good Government

The Caribbean people possess extraordinary resilience.


Forged through slavery, colonialism, economic hardship, and migration, that resilience remains one of the region's greatest strengths. It echoes the enduring spirit reflected in Bob Marley's music—a people constantly fighting for survival without surrendering their humanity.

Yet resilience should never become an excuse for governmental failure.


No society can permanently ask its citizens to compensate for weak institutions, poor planning, and ineffective leadership.


Resilience sustains people.

Good governance transforms nations.


"Chaka Chaka" Governance and the Cost of Political Short-Termism

Too much Caribbean governance remains trapped in what may be called "Chaka Chaka" politics—government by public relations, election giveaways, and short-term political calculations instead of coherent national development planning.



* Transformational investment is repeatedly sacrificed for transactional politics.

* Public accountability remains inconsistent.


* Corruption frequently escapes meaningful consequences.


Meanwhile, ordinary citizens bear the burden through higher prices, lower productivity, and limited opportunity.


Human justice requires institutions capable of holding every level of power accountable.

No sustainable economy can be built upon selective accountability.


Caribbean Sovereignty in a Changing World

The Caribbean's economic future cannot be separated from changing global geopolitics.

Cuba continues confronting severe energy shortages, inflationary pressures, and electricity disruptions under prolonged external sanctions. Venezuela remains central to regional energy security despite continuing geopolitical tensions.


Meanwhile, countries across Africa, Asia, and Latin America increasingly diversify economic partnerships with China, Russia, India, and other emerging economies in pursuit of investment, energy security, and infrastructure financing.


The Caribbean must similarly preserve sufficient strategic flexibility to pursue development partnerships that best serve its own national interests.


Regional solidarity should never become conditional upon external approval.

Marcus Garvey understood that political freedom without economic independence remains incomplete. His vision remains unfinished.


Beyond the Growth Illusion

The Caribbean's growth illusion is ultimately structural rather than temporary.

It reflects an economic model that rewards circulation instead of production, consumption instead of manufacturing, dependence instead of self-reliance, and short-term stability instead of long-term transformation.



Breaking this cycle demands bold investment in productive agriculture, domestic industry, renewable energy, technological innovation, land reform, accountable governance, and regional economic cooperation.


Growth should never be measured solely by GDP.


It must be measured by whether families can afford nutritious food, own decent homes, educate their children, access quality healthcare, and live with dignity.


For the mother, Mrs. Linda, preparing breakfast in rural St. Mary—and for millions of Caribbean families—the real question is not whether the economy is growing.

The question is whether that growth belongs to them.


Until it does, Caribbean prosperity will remain largely statistical, and economic dignity will continue to be deferred.


That is the bitta truth.


About the Author

Norris R. McDonald is an author, respiratory therapist, and economic journalist whose work focuses on political economy, public health, healthcare systems, and global public policy. He is a regular contributor of public commentary and analysis for the Jamaica Gleaner, where he examines the intersection of economics, governance, social justice, and development in Jamaica, the Caribbean, and the Global South.

_____________

Follow Sulfabittas: Caribbean Political Analysis,  for comprehensive political analysis on major Caribbean and global political developments affecting Jamaica and the world.

READ MORE SULFABITTAS: CARIBBEAN POLITICAL ANALYSIS ON CUBA HERE: 👇]



Norris R. McDonald President Trump Marches On A New Political Crusade Against Cuba


________

Norris R. McDonald | Mice, men, Cuban doctors, and our predatory world

Sunday, March 8, 2026

The Revolt Against Empire: America, Israel, Iran and the End of the 'One Don' World Order!'

Is US-dominated World Order Now Dead?
A comprehensive anti-imperialist analysis of modern geopolitics, exploring the role of Iran, the United States, Israel, and the Clash of Civilizations framework. Examines cultural identity, multipolarity, and the myths of American global dominance. 
 

By Norris R. McDonald, DIJ

Author | Economic Journalist | Human Rights Advocate

SULFABITTAS NEWS, March 8, 2026


“The Ayatollah was not a president, he was a religious leader… and the United States and Israel turned him into a martyr.”
— Thomas Massie
Norris R. McDonald, DIJ

Throughout human history, the arc of power has never followed a straight line, nor has conquest ever resulted in permanent submission. Empires rise and fall, yet cultural memory, faith, and civilizational identity endure, often in ways that frustrate the ambitions of the most powerful states. 


In the twenty-first century, the United States, Israel, and Iran exemplify this paradox, revealing that political domination cannot extinguish the deeper forces that shape human society.

Rep. Thomas Massie

Geopolitical Rivalry and the Power of Martyrdom

Massie’s observation captures a recurring paradox of modern geopolitics: when dominant states confront ideological or charismatic leaders whom they cannot control, those leaders often emerge as enduring symbols of resistance whose influence extends far beyond immediate military or political contests.  


This dynamic has defined decades of confrontation between Iran and the Western-aligned regional order, led primarily by the United States and Israel. Sustained external pressure—through sanctions, military threat, diplomatic isolation, and covert operations—has repeatedly reinforced the symbolic authority of Iranian religious and political leadership across parts of the Muslim world.

Few figures embody this phenomenon more clearly than Ruhollah Khomeini, the cleric who led Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution. 

Already revered by his followers as a religious and political thinker, Ayatollah Khomeini's brutal, cynical murder on February 28, 2026, by Israel and America, has now set the Middle East on fire. 

Khomeini’s legacy was amplified by decades of confrontation with Western powers. The resulting narratives of martyrdom and resistance extend far beyond the borders of Iran, reflecting a broader struggle over sovereignty, identity, and the defense of civilizational values.

Geopolitical rivalry does more than reshape alliances; it produces enduring narratives that intertwine religion, history, and political legitimacy.

The confrontation between Iran, the United States, and Israel has repeatedly ignited wars, proxy conflicts, and humanitarian crises throughout the Middle East—from Iraq and Syria to Gaza and Lebanon—devastating cities, displacing millions, and reshaping regional alliances. 


While these crises are often analyzed through conventional frameworks of military strategy and balance-of-power politics, they also reflect deeper tensions embedded in religion, culture, and civilizational identity.


From Post–Cold War Optimism to Civilizational Conflict

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Western observers heralded the apparent triumph of liberal democracy. 


Professor Francis Fukuyama
Francis Fukuyama in his book 'The End of History And The Last Man' famously argued that humanity had reached the “end of history,” with liberal democracy and market capitalism emerging as the ultimate form of political organization. 

For a brief moment, this vision appeared plausible: the United States dominated globally, democratic transitions spread, and markets integrated across continents. Yet beneath this optimism, deeper currents persisted: religious identity, civilizational memory, and resistance to domination, which would ultimately challenge the notion of a permanent liberal order.


Samuel P. Huntington offered a different interpretation, emphasizing the enduring influence of civilizational identity. In his work The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Huntington argued that future conflicts would be defined less by ideology and more by cultural, religious, and
historical fault lines. 


This framework remains profoundly relevant today, as geopolitical crises increasingly intersect with questions of faith, identity, and historical memory.


Professor Louis A. Moyston’s Insight


Professor Louis A. Moyston
Professor Louis A. Moyston has reinforced Huntington’s thesis by highlighting how globalization has intensified, rather than erased, civilizational awareness. In his commentary on contemporary geopolitical tensions, Moyston emphasizes that cultural identity shapes not only how societies interpret external pressures but also how they mobilize resistance. 
In the Middle East, and across other regions confronting imperial influence, conflicts often transcend conventional strategic calculations, becoming moral and civilizational struggles that reflect a society’s historical memory and spiritual identity.

 Globalization has not dissolved civilizational boundaries; it has sharpened them, turning political conflict into a struggle over identity and historical memory.

The Myth of the “One Don World Order”

From my perspective, the assumption that the collapse of the Soviet Union would result in an uncontested American-led world order was historically naive. 


In my Jamaica Gleaner article, India, 'Imperialism, Fukuyama and the ‘One Don World Order’, I argued that concentrated authority inevitably generates resistance, and imperial ambitions provoke opposition from those defending sovereignty, resources, and culture. 

Historical experience consistently demonstrates a central truth of global politics: systems of domination inevitably produce resistance. Empires may command enormous military and economic power, yet they repeatedly confront the same structural limitation—the refusal of subject peoples to permanently accept subordination.

Recent developments in West Africa illustrate this pattern. Across the Sahel, rising currents of Pan-African political consciousness have challenged the long shadow of French influence in the region. Movements emphasizing sovereignty, national dignity, and regional cooperation reflect a broader shift away from the structures of post-colonial dependency that defined much of the late twentieth century. 

While the process remains incomplete, the growing rejection of external military presence signals an important transformation in political consciousness across parts of the continent.

The Limits of Empire and the Persistence of Resistance

This dynamic is not unique to Africa. Across the Global South, societies shaped by colonial history continue to resist forms of external domination—whether military, political, or economic. The struggles unfolding around the question of Palestinian self-determination, as well as ongoing tensions in the Middle East more broadly, reflect the enduring power of national identity, historical memory, and collective resistance. 

Decades ago, the revolutionary thinker Frantz Fanon described such populations as the “wretched of the earth,” arguing that the experience of domination inevitably generates movements seeking dignity and liberation.

Similar dynamics appear in the Western Hemisphere. For more than half a century, efforts to isolate and pressure countries such as Cuba and Venezuela have encountered resilient political cultures rooted in sovereignty and anti-imperialist traditions. These experiences demonstrate that external coercion, even when backed by overwhelming military capacity, cannot easily extinguish deeply rooted aspirations for independence.

Donald Trump's Nietzschean God King Complex
Taken together, these developments highlight a broader historical lesson: empires rarely secure permanent global dominance. Military superiority can impose temporary order, but it cannot erase the cultural identity, historical memory, and political will of populations determined to resist.

The long arc of political struggle therefore points toward a recurring pattern. Wherever systems of domination attempt to entrench themselves indefinitely, they eventually confront organized opposition from those who refuse to accept their subordination as destiny. In this sense, the history of empire is also the history of resistance—and that resistance continues to shape the emerging political landscape of the twenty-first century.

President Donald Trump has a Nietzschean God King Complex

The rise of nationalist politics under Donald Trump, with his narcissistic, Nietzschean God King Complex, further exemplifies this dynamic. The contemporary reinterpretation of the Monroe Doctrine seeks global influence under the guise of moral and strategic authority, yet history demonstrates that imperial overreach inevitably provokes countervailing forces, both regionally and globally.

The Emergence of a Multipolar World

Global politics is increasingly defined by multipolarity. China, under Xi Jinping, has leveraged economic strength and the Belt and Road Initiative to extend influence across continents, while BRICS has emerged as a platform for non-Western coordination. 


NATO’s confrontations with Russia and the destabilization of Europe through energy crises highlight the fragility of Western dominance, while rising U.S. debt and skepticism about the dollar signal the erosion of unilateral power. 


These developments underscore that the era of uncontested American global dominance is ending, giving way to a more contested multipolar international system.

The fantasy of a permanent ‘One Don World Order’ has collided with the enduring realities of multipolarity and civilizational resistance.


Huntington vs. Fukuyama: A Continuing Debate

The contrast between Huntington and Fukuyama continues to frame contemporary geopolitical discourse. 

Professor Samuel P. Huntington

While Fukuyama envisioned ideological convergence, Huntington and Moyston remind us that civilizational identity, historical memory, and cultural resistance remain potent forces. Wars in the Middle East, geopolitical rivalry between rising powers, and enduring resistance to imperialist agendas repeatedly affirm the ongoing relevance of civilizational frameworks in understanding global politics.


A World Still Searching for Its Future

Three decades after the Cold War, the global system remains in flux. Imperial ambitions clash with civilizational identity, multipolar powers assert themselves, and economic, cultural, and political fault lines continue to generate conflict. 


The world envisioned under a permanent “One Don World Order” has collided with enduring realities of resistance, multipolarity, and cultural assertion. The twenty-first century is likely to be defined not by the triumph of a single power but by ongoing negotiation, contestation, and civilizational assertion, in which empires are tested and the enduring relevance of faith, history, and identity shapes the trajectory of global politics.

History has not ended; it has entered a new and uncertain chapter. Those who wish to understand the unfolding world must recognize the interplay of empire, culture, and resistance in determining the shape of the global order for generations to come.

Call to Action

If this analysis resonates with your view of global politics, join the conversation.  Subscribe to my Substack for in-depth commentary on international affairs, anti-imperialist perspectives, and the ongoing struggle between empire and civilizational identity. Share your thoughts, debate the ideas, and help build a community committed to understanding the forces shaping our world.


Copyright 2026- Norris R. McDonald, SULFABITTAS NEWS, @sulfabittas


About the Author

Norris R. McDonald is an author, respiratory therapist, and economic journalist whose work focuses on political economy, public health, healthcare systems, and global public policy. He is a regular contributor of public commentary and analysis for the Jamaica Gleaner, where he examines the intersection of economics, governance, social justice, and development in Jamaica, the Caribbean, and the Global South.


With professional training in Economic Journalism and respiratory care and, decades of frontline healthcare experience, McDonald brings a clinical and evidence-based perspective to issues from global conflicts and foreign policy; to maternal mortality, health inequities, pharmaceutical policy, and healthcare access. His journalism blends data-driven analysis with historical and cultural context, particularly around Black communities, post-colonial development, and structural inequality.


McDonald is also the publisher of Sulfabittas Newsmagazine on Substack, where he produces investigative features, long-form essays, and geopolitical commentary on global power dynamics, economic sovereignty, and emerging multipolar realities.